Repository navigation
Description
TanStack Devtools version
@tanstack/react-devtools:0.10.14@tanstack/devtools-vite:0.8.6@tanstack/devtools-bundler-core:0.1.4@tanstack/react-hotkeys-devtools:0.14.1- Transitive
@tanstack/devtools-ui:0.7.2
Framework/Library version
React 19.3.1; TanStack Start 1.169.4; Vite 8.3.5 / Rolldown 1.2.7 through Vite+ 1.4.0; Node.js 26.13.0.
Describe the bug
The production transform removes <TanStackDevtools> but leaves a plugin factory's import when the factory is used directly in the plugins array:
import { TanStackDevtools } from '@tanstack/react-devtools';
import { hotkeysDevtoolsPlugin } from '@tanstack/react-hotkeys-devtools';
export const App = () => (
<TanStackDevtools plugins={[hotkeysDevtoolsPlugin()]} />
);hotkeysDevtoolsPlugin is used only inside the removed element, but its import survives. The equivalent inline { name: 'Hotkeys', render: <HotkeysDevtoolsPanel /> } form removes both the element and the plugin import.
This occurs with devtools() first in the Vite plugins array and the default production removal enabled.
Minimal reproduction
The following isolates the stripping bug without a browser, app configuration, or access to the downstream repository. The React imports are source text passed to the parser, so only the bundler-core package needs to be installed.
Run in an empty directory:
npm init -y
npm install --save-exact @tanstack/devtools-bundler-core@0.1.4
node --input-type=module <<'NODE'
import { removeDevtools } from '@tanstack/devtools-bundler-core';
const factory = `import { TanStackDevtools } from '@tanstack/react-devtools';
import { hotkeysDevtoolsPlugin } from '@tanstack/react-hotkeys-devtools';
export const App = () => <TanStackDevtools plugins={[hotkeysDevtoolsPlugin()]} />;`;
const panel = `import { TanStackDevtools } from '@tanstack/react-devtools';
import { HotkeysDevtoolsPanel } from '@tanstack/react-hotkeys-devtools';
export const App = () => <TanStackDevtools plugins={[{name: 'Hotkeys', render: <HotkeysDevtoolsPanel/>}]} />;`;
for (const [name, source] of Object.entries({ factory, panel })) {
console.log(`${name}:\n${removeDevtools(source, 'App.tsx')?.code}`);
}
NODEActual output, reproduced against the installed package:
factory:
import { hotkeysDevtoolsPlugin } from '@tanstack/react-hotkeys-devtools';
export const App = () => null;
panel:
export const App = () => null;Expected behavior
Both examples should produce export const App = () => null;, with no plugin import left behind. A factory import used elsewhere should of course be preserved.
Source investigation
In getPluginReferences, each array element is skipped unless it is an ObjectExpression:
if (!el || el.type !== 'ObjectExpression') continueA direct hotkeysDevtoolsPlugin() entry is a CallExpression, so its identifier is never collected for the subsequent plugin-import cleanup. The logic handles calls inside an object's render property, but not calls directly inside the plugins array.
Associated production-build impact
Our production client build contains no retained devtools modules, but emits these unreferenced fonts from @tanstack/devtools-ui:
| Asset | Uncompressed bytes |
|---|---|
BricolageGrotesque-Bold-BIJrwikb.BIJrwikb.ttf |
82,204 |
Inter-latin-BwkfbSeq.BwkfbSeq.woff2 |
72,920 |
| Total | 155,124 (151.49 KiB) |
Neither filename is referenced by the generated client JS, CSS, HTML, or JSON. This increases emitted-output measurements; it is not evidence of an additional browser download.
The surviving static import appears to expose Vite's related unused-asset retention behavior (vitejs/vite#9073). The transform reproduction above establishes the import-cleanup gap independently of that bundler behavior.
Downstream tracking
Found while investigating mykiary/caniplay.today#293. That repository is private; the standalone reproduction above does not require access.
No upstream fix PR yet.
Terms & Code of Conduct
- I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
- I understand that if my bug cannot be reliable reproduced in a debuggable environment, it will probably not be fixed and this issue may even be closed.
Activity
github-actions commentedon Nov 3, 2026
Thanks for the detailed report and standalone reproduction; the technical details are sufficient to investigate. The only missing required template items are the two acknowledgements. Could you confirm that you agree to follow the project's Code of Conduct and understand that reports need to be reliably reproducible in a debuggable environment to be investigated and fixed?