[tomasr8]

Let's see if it helps..

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.67%. Comparing base (19d490d) to head (2d5435e).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1462      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.13%   93.67%   +0.54%     
==========================================
  Files          27       27              
  Lines        4983     4983              
==========================================
+ Hits         4641     4668      +27     
+ Misses        342      315      -27     

Flag	Coverage Δ
macos-26-3.10	92.75% <ø> (ø)
macos-26-3.11	92.69% <ø> (?)
macos-26-3.12	92.95% <ø> (?)
macos-26-3.13	92.95% <ø> (?)
macos-26-3.14	92.93% <ø> (?)
macos-26-3.15	92.93% <ø> (?)
macos-26-3.9	92.69% <ø> (?)
macos-26-pypy3.10	92.75% <ø> (?)
ubuntu-24.04-3.10	92.77% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu-24.04-3.11	92.71% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu-24.04-3.12	92.97% <ø> (?)
ubuntu-24.04-3.13	92.97% <ø> (?)
ubuntu-24.04-3.14	92.95% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu-24.04-3.15	92.95% <ø> (?)
ubuntu-24.04-3.9	92.71% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu-24.04-pypy3.10	92.77% <ø> (?)
windows-2025-3.10	92.76% <ø> (?)
windows-2025-3.11	92.70% <ø> (?)
windows-2025-3.12	92.96% <ø> (?)
windows-2025-3.13	92.96% <ø> (?)
windows-2025-3.14	92.94% <ø> (?)
windows-2025-3.15	92.94% <ø> (?)
windows-2025-3.9	92.70% <ø> (?)
windows-2025-pypy3.10	92.76% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 88 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing tomasr8:fix-ci (2d5435e) with master (3072a70)¹}

Footnotes

1. No successful run was found on master (19d490d) during the generation of this report, so 3072a70 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

[tomasr8]

CI looks green now and the cache is skipped. Once pypa/pip#14431 is fixed, we can restore it.

[akx]

Added a comment, approving :)